1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
|
From fe2b1226656afae56702d1d84c6900f6b67df297 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 11:23:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] leds: trigger: netdev: fix RTNL handling to prevent potential
deadlock
When working on LED support for r8169 I got the following lockdep
warning. Easiest way to prevent this scenario seems to be to take
the RTNL lock before the trigger_data lock in set_device_name().
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.7.0-rc2-next-20231124+ #2 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
bash/383 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888103aa1c68 (&trigger_data->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: netdev_trig_notify+0xec/0x190 [ledtrig_netdev]
but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8cddf808 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_lock+0x12/0x20
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x9b/0xb50
mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20
rtnl_lock+0x12/0x20
set_device_name+0xa9/0x120 [ledtrig_netdev]
netdev_trig_activate+0x1a1/0x230 [ledtrig_netdev]
led_trigger_set+0x172/0x2c0
led_trigger_write+0xf1/0x140
sysfs_kf_bin_write+0x5d/0x80
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x15d/0x210
vfs_write+0x1f0/0x510
ksys_write+0x6c/0xf0
__x64_sys_write+0x14/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xf0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6c/0x74
-> #0 (&trigger_data->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1459/0x25a0
lock_acquire+0xc8/0x2d0
__mutex_lock+0x9b/0xb50
mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20
netdev_trig_notify+0xec/0x190 [ledtrig_netdev]
call_netdevice_register_net_notifiers+0x5a/0x100
register_netdevice_notifier+0x85/0x120
netdev_trig_activate+0x1d4/0x230 [ledtrig_netdev]
led_trigger_set+0x172/0x2c0
led_trigger_write+0xf1/0x140
sysfs_kf_bin_write+0x5d/0x80
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x15d/0x210
vfs_write+0x1f0/0x510
ksys_write+0x6c/0xf0
__x64_sys_write+0x14/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xf0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6c/0x74
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(rtnl_mutex);
lock(&trigger_data->lock);
lock(rtnl_mutex);
lock(&trigger_data->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
8 locks held by bash/383:
#0: ffff888103ff33f0 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x6c/0xf0
#1: ffff888103aa1e88 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x114/0x210
#2: ffff8881036f1890 (kn->active#82){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x11d/0x210
#3: ffff888108e2c358 (&led_cdev->led_access){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: led_trigger_write+0x30/0x140
#4: ffffffff8cdd9e10 (triggers_list_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: led_trigger_write+0x75/0x140
#5: ffff888108e2c270 (&led_cdev->trigger_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: led_trigger_write+0xe3/0x140
#6: ffffffff8cdde3d0 (pernet_ops_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: register_netdevice_notifier+0x1c/0x120
#7: ffffffff8cddf808 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_lock+0x12/0x20
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 383 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.7.0-rc2-next-20231124+ #2
Hardware name: Default string Default string/Default string, BIOS ADLN.M6.SODIMM.ZB.CY.015 08/08/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x5c/0xd0
dump_stack+0x10/0x20
print_circular_bug+0x2dd/0x410
check_noncircular+0x131/0x150
__lock_acquire+0x1459/0x25a0
lock_acquire+0xc8/0x2d0
? netdev_trig_notify+0xec/0x190 [ledtrig_netdev]
__mutex_lock+0x9b/0xb50
? netdev_trig_notify+0xec/0x190 [ledtrig_netdev]
? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
? netdev_trig_notify+0xec/0x190 [ledtrig_netdev]
? __cancel_work_timer+0x11c/0x1b0
? __mutex_lock+0x123/0xb50
mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20
? mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20
netdev_trig_notify+0xec/0x190 [ledtrig_netdev]
call_netdevice_register_net_notifiers+0x5a/0x100
register_netdevice_notifier+0x85/0x120
netdev_trig_activate+0x1d4/0x230 [ledtrig_netdev]
led_trigger_set+0x172/0x2c0
? preempt_count_add+0x49/0xc0
led_trigger_write+0xf1/0x140
sysfs_kf_bin_write+0x5d/0x80
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x15d/0x210
vfs_write+0x1f0/0x510
ksys_write+0x6c/0xf0
__x64_sys_write+0x14/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xf0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6c/0x74
RIP: 0033:0x7f269055d034
Code: c7 00 16 00 00 00 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d 35 c3 0d 00 00 74 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 c3 0f 1f 00 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffddb7ef748 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000007 RCX: 00007f269055d034
RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 000055bf5f4af3c0 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: 000055bf5f4af3c0 R08: 0000000000000073 R09: 0000000000000001
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000007
R13: 00007f26906325c0 R14: 00007f269062ff20 R15: 0000000000000000
</TASK>
Fixes: d5e01266e7f5 ("leds: trigger: netdev: add additional specific link speed mode")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fb5c8294-2a10-4bf5-8f10-3d2b77d2757e@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c
@@ -235,6 +235,11 @@ static int set_device_name(struct led_ne
{
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&trigger_data->work);
+ /*
+ * Take RTNL lock before trigger_data lock to prevent potential
+ * deadlock with netdev notifier registration.
+ */
+ rtnl_lock();
mutex_lock(&trigger_data->lock);
if (trigger_data->net_dev) {
@@ -254,16 +259,14 @@ static int set_device_name(struct led_ne
trigger_data->carrier_link_up = false;
trigger_data->link_speed = SPEED_UNKNOWN;
trigger_data->duplex = DUPLEX_UNKNOWN;
- if (trigger_data->net_dev != NULL) {
- rtnl_lock();
+ if (trigger_data->net_dev)
get_device_state(trigger_data);
- rtnl_unlock();
- }
trigger_data->last_activity = 0;
set_baseline_state(trigger_data);
mutex_unlock(&trigger_data->lock);
+ rtnl_unlock();
return 0;
}
|