| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BCM63xx maintainance is a PITA since there's no full Device Tree support and
therefore every board needs it's own definition in board_bcm963xx.c
There's no DSA support for this board and there have been very few
contributions in the last years.
Moreover, BCM63xx SoCs >= BCM6358 are already supported in bmips target, so
any efforts to keep this target alive aren't worth the time.
Let's focus the community efforts on improving bmips instead.
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Initial conversion to new LED color/function format
and drop label format where possible. The same label
is composed at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
|
|
|
After the LED labels have been made more general by removing
the model names, we can move several definitions to DTSI files
to reduce the amount of duplicate code.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
|