| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BCM63xx maintainance is a PITA since there's no full Device Tree support and
therefore every board needs it's own definition in board_bcm963xx.c
There's no DSA support for this board and there have been very few
contributions in the last years.
Moreover, BCM63xx SoCs >= BCM6358 are already supported in bmips target, so
any efforts to keep this target alive aren't worth the time.
Let's focus the community efforts on improving bmips instead.
Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The "/dts-v1/;" identifier is supposed to be present once at the
top of a device tree file after the includes have been processed.
Like done for other targets recently, put the dts-v1 statement
into the top-level SoC-based DTSI files, and remove all other
occurences.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While "ok" is recognized in DT parsing, only "okay" is actually
mentioned as valid value. Replace it accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
|
|
|
This change makes the names of Broadcom targets consistent by using
the common notation based on SoC/CPU ID (which is used internally
anyway), bcmXXXX instead of brcmXXXX.
This is even used for target TITLE in make menuconfig already,
only the short target name used brcm so far.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Schmutzler <freifunk@adrianschmutzler.de>
|