diff options
author | Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> | 2015-07-08 16:35:52 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> | 2015-07-08 20:36:22 +0000 |
commit | 8c3a5b49c8ed9a906664f98bcf76c87ab6307a5b (patch) | |
tree | ceae01d64791e1bc92e4ca57528de5976d0c8b11 /content/open-source.article | |
parent | 7b101d6e451f8ff9e184553a13f8be5f64974001 (diff) |
content/open-source: fix hyperlinks
Change-Id: Icd4157f0a818bf5c93885b3f9c508a03c834a711
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11984
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'content/open-source.article')
-rw-r--r-- | content/open-source.article | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/content/open-source.article b/content/open-source.article index 82cd338..cb85b93 100644 --- a/content/open-source.article +++ b/content/open-source.article @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ Other people have made similar observations. Here are two. Last year, on RedMonk.com, Donnie Berkholz wrote about -[[Go as the emerging language of cloud infrastructure][http://redmonk.com/dberkholz/2014/03/18/go-the-emerging-language-of-cloud-infrastructure/], +“[[http://redmonk.com/dberkholz/2014/03/18/go-the-emerging-language-of-cloud-infrastructure/][Go as the emerging language of cloud infrastructure]],” observing that “[Go's] marquee projects ... are cloud-centric or otherwise made for dealing with distributed systems @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ or transient environments.” This year, on Texlution.com, the author wrote an article titled -[[Why Golang is doomed to succeed][https://texlution.com/post/why-go-is-doomed-to-succeed/]], +“[[https://texlution.com/post/why-go-is-doomed-to-succeed/][Why Golang is doomed to succeed]],” pointing out that this focus on large-scale development was possibly even better suited to open source than to Google itself: “This open source fitness is why I think |