aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/open-source.article
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRuss Cox <rsc@golang.org>2015-07-08 16:35:52 -0400
committerRuss Cox <rsc@golang.org>2015-07-08 20:36:22 +0000
commit8c3a5b49c8ed9a906664f98bcf76c87ab6307a5b (patch)
treeceae01d64791e1bc92e4ca57528de5976d0c8b11 /content/open-source.article
parent7b101d6e451f8ff9e184553a13f8be5f64974001 (diff)
content/open-source: fix hyperlinks
Change-Id: Icd4157f0a818bf5c93885b3f9c508a03c834a711 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11984 Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'content/open-source.article')
-rw-r--r--content/open-source.article4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/content/open-source.article b/content/open-source.article
index 82cd338..cb85b93 100644
--- a/content/open-source.article
+++ b/content/open-source.article
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ Other people have made similar observations.
Here are two.
Last year, on RedMonk.com, Donnie Berkholz
wrote about
-[[Go as the emerging language of cloud infrastructure][http://redmonk.com/dberkholz/2014/03/18/go-the-emerging-language-of-cloud-infrastructure/],
+“[[http://redmonk.com/dberkholz/2014/03/18/go-the-emerging-language-of-cloud-infrastructure/][Go as the emerging language of cloud infrastructure]],”
observing that
“[Go's] marquee projects ... are cloud-centric or otherwise
made for dealing with distributed systems
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ or transient environments.”
This year, on Texlution.com, the author
wrote an article titled
-[[Why Golang is doomed to succeed][https://texlution.com/post/why-go-is-doomed-to-succeed/]],
+“[[https://texlution.com/post/why-go-is-doomed-to-succeed/][Why Golang is doomed to succeed]],”
pointing out that this focus on large-scale development
was possibly even better suited to open source than
to Google itself: “This open source fitness is why I think