| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is no RFC requirement that DHCPv6 servers must reply with a link local
address and some ISP servers in the wild appear to using addresses in the ULA
range to send DHCPv6 offers.
Signed-off-by: Jo-Philipp Wich <jow@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 47048
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Seems like my second try was again whitespace broken. Sorry for the noise.
Remove src_port from firewall.config to receive dhcpv6 replies. Fixes #20295.
Signed-off-by: Anselm Eberhardt <a.eberhardt@cygnusnetworks.de>
SVN-Revision: 46842
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org>
SVN-Revision: 46506
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Steven Barth <steven@midlink.org>
SVN-Revision: 46478
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The WAN port should at least respond to IGMP and MLD queries as
otherwise a snooping bridge/switch might drop traffic.
RFC4890 recommends to leave IGMP and MLD unfiltered as they are always
link-scoped anyways.
Signed-off-by: Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@c0d3.blue>
SVN-Revision: 45613
|
| |
|
|
| |
SVN-Revision: 37171
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
head with compatibility fixes for AA
SVN-Revision: 36838
|
| |
|
|
| |
SVN-Revision: 36837
|
| |
|
|
| |
SVN-Revision: 36622
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
from leaking out to the internet
SVN-Revision: 35012
|
|
|
SVN-Revision: 33688
|