aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests/result/http-proxy.pcapng.out
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* STUN: add detection of ZOOM peer-to-peer flows (#1825)Ivan Nardi2022-12-11
| | | | See: "Enabling Passive Measurement of Zoom Performance in Production Networks" https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3517745.3561414
* Updated test resultsLuca Deri2022-12-05
|
* Remove classification "by-ip" from protocol stack (#1743)Ivan Nardi2022-09-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Basically: * "classification by-ip" (i.e. `flow->guessed_protocol_id_by_ip` is NEVER returned in the protocol stack (i.e. `flow->detected_protocol_stack[]`); * if the application is interested into such information, it can access `ndpi_protocol->protocol_by_ip` itself. There are mainly 4 points in the code that set the "classification by-ip" in the protocol stack: the generic `ndpi_set_detected_protocol()`/ `ndpi_detection_giveup()` functions and the HTTP/STUN dissectors. In the unit tests output, a print about `ndpi_protocol->protocol_by_ip` has been added for each flow: the huge diff of this commit is mainly due to that. Strictly speaking, this change is NOT an API/ABI breakage, but there are important differences in the classification results. For examples: * TLS flows without the initial handshake (or without a matching SNI/certificate) are simply classified as `TLS`; * similar for HTTP or QUIC flows; * DNS flows without a matching request domain are simply classified as `DNS`; we don't have `DNS/Google` anymore just because the server is 8.8.8.8 (that was an outrageous behaviour...); * flows previusoly classified only "by-ip" are now classified as `NDPI_PROTOCOL_UNKNOWN`. See #1425 for other examples of why adding the "classification by-ip" in the protocol stack is a bad idea. Please, note that IPV6 is not supported :( (long standing issue in nDPI) i.e. `ndpi_protocol->protocol_by_ip` wil be always `NDPI_PROTOCOL_UNKNOWN` for IPv6 flows. Define `NDPI_CONFIDENCE_MATCH_BY_IP` has been removed. Close #1687
* Fix `ndpi_do_guess()` (#1731)Ivan Nardi2022-09-12
| | | | | Avoid a double call of `ndpi_guess_host_protocol_id()`. Some code paths work for ipv4/6 both Remove some never used code.
* Patricia tree, Ahocarasick automa, LRU cache: add statistics (#1683)Ivan Nardi2022-07-29
| | | | | | | | | | Add (basic) internal stats to the main data structures used by the library; they might be usefull to check how effective these structures are. Add an option to `ndpiReader` to dump them; enabled by default in the unit tests. This new option enables/disables dumping of "num dissectors calls" values, too (see b4cb14ec).
* TINC: avoid processing SYN packets (#1676)Ivan Nardi2022-07-28
| | | | | | | | | | | Since e6b332aa, we have proper support for detecting client/server direction. So Tinc dissector is now able to properly initialize the cache entry only when needed and not anymore at the SYN time; initializing that entry for **every** SYN packets was a complete waste of resources. Since 4896dabb, the various `struct ndpi_call_function_struct` structures are not more separate objects and therefore comparing them using only their pointers is bogus: this bug was triggered by this change because `ndpi_str->callback_buffer_size_tcp_no_payload` is now 0.
* Update the protocol bitmask for some protocols (#1675)Ivan Nardi2022-07-27
| | | | | | | Tcp retransmissions should be ignored. Remove some unused protocol bitmasks. Update script to download Whatsapp IP list.
* Improve handling of HTTP-Proxy and HTTP-Connect (#1673)Ivan Nardi2022-07-25
Treat HTTP-Proxy and HTTP-Connect flows like the HTTP ones: print/serialize all the attributes and allow parsing of replies. The line about "1kxun" has been removed to avoid regressions in 1KXUN classification in `tests/pcap/1kxun.pcap`. I haven't fully understod what was happening but the comment at the beginning of `static ndpi_category_match category_match[]` says that we can't have overlaps between `host_match` and `category_match` lists and that is no longer true since 938e89ca. Bottom line: removing this line seems the right thing to do, anyway.