| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Start using a dictionary for fuzzing (see:
https://llvm.org/docs/LibFuzzer.html#dictionaries).
Remove some dead code.
Fuzzing with debug enabled is not usually a great idea (from performance
POV). Keep the code since it might be useful while debugging.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
We *do* want to have some allocation errors.
Fix some related bugs
Fix: 29be01ef
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The goal of this fuzzer is to test init and deinit of the library, with
different configurations. In details:
* random memory allocation failures, even during init phase
* random `ndpi_init_prefs` parameter of `ndpi_init_detection_module()`
* random LRU caches sizes
* random bitmask of enabled protocols
* random parameters of `ndpi_set_detection_preferences()`
* random initialization of opportunistic TLS
* random load/don't load of configuration files
This new fuzzer is a C++ file, because it uses `FuzzedDataProvider`
class (see
https://github.com/google/fuzzing/blob/master/docs/split-inputs.md).
Note that the (existing) fuzzers need to be linked with C++ compiler
anyway, so this new fuzzer doesn't add any new requirements.
|
|
|
Load some custom configuration (like in the unit tests) and factorize some
(fuzzing) common code.
There is no way to pass file paths to the fuzzers as parameters. The safe
solution seems to be to load them from the process working dir. Anyway,
missing file is not a blocking error.
Remove some dead code (found looking at the coverage report)
|